PA Judge Brann is not having it, writing the Trump campaign lawyers "ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters.... One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and...

 

2/ "...factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this
Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened...

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) November 22, 2020

3/ "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained
legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence..."https://t.co/YxMCOH8dOi

— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) November 22, 2020