In victory for Texas prisoner, #SCOTUS rules 7-2 that a motion to alter or amend a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) is not a second or successive petition for habeas corpus, increasing likelihood of federal post-conviction review— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 1, 2020
Monday, June 1, 2020
In victory for Texas prisoner, #SCOTUS rules 7-2 that a motion to alter or amend a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) is not a second or successive petition for habeas corpus, increasing likelihood of federal post-conviction review
