One puzzling feature of the article is that it doesn't say what the supposedly withheld evidence was, or why it was exculpatory. Flynn's lawyers have previously argued that DOJ withheld shocking, exculpatory evidence, but the judge found it to be neither of those things

One puzzling feature of the article is that it doesn't say what the supposedly withheld evidence was, or why it was exculpatory.

Flynn's lawyers have previously argued that DOJ withheld shocking, exculpatory evidence, but the judge found it to be neither of those things. https://t.co/xque61Lqyn

— Brad Heath (@bradheath) April 25, 2020