If the Supreme Court, based on virus fears, decides to hold the March and April arguments without allowing seating by public, then it should use that as an opportunity to allow for live-streaming of the audio of the oral arguments.

If the Supreme Court, based on virus fears, decides to hold the March and April arguments without allowing seating by public, then it should use that as an opportunity to allow for live-streaming of the audio of the oral arguments. https://t.co/GE9I9jJcjm

— Bob Loeb (@BobLoeb) March 10, 2020